Legal Opinion

Stockton East Water District v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 30, 2009No. 2007-5142PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

In the history of the western United States, the fight for water rights is a central theme. California, because a goodly part of the state shares the desert-like conditions that lie at the root of the fight, since before its founding has been one of the locales for this battle. This case is another chapter in that state’s long-running history of water disputes.1

Plaintiffs Stockton East Water District (“Stockton East”) and Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District (“Central”) (collectively, “plaintiffs” or “the Districts”) are water agencies organized under the laws…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. Labatte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API