Dobyns v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge:
In this case, an agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) alleges that, following a highly successful undercover operation, ATF failed to protect him and his family from threats and violence, and otherwise subjected him to a hostile work environment. He asserts that ATF’s malfeasance and misfeasance in these and other regards violated an agreement he had with the agency settling a prior employment dispute, thereby giving rise to contract claims over which this court has jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491. Defendant argues…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Klamath Tribe Claims Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Laboratory Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Insight Systems Corp., and Centerscope Technologies, Inc. v. the United States 12-863c andUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.