Legal Opinion

Dobyns v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 15, 2010No. 08-700CPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge:

In this case, an agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) alleges that, following a highly successful undercover operation, ATF failed to protect him and his family from threats and violence, and otherwise subjected him to a hostile work environment. He asserts that ATF’s malfeasance and misfeasance in these and other regards violated an agreement he had with the agency settling a prior employment dispute, thereby giving rise to contract claims over which this court has jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491. Defendant argues…

2Cases cited89 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Klamath Tribe Claims Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Laboratory Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Insight Systems Corp., and Centerscope Technologies, Inc. v. the United States 12-863c andUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API