Legal Opinion

Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Holder

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 2009No. 08-322PublishedCited by 248 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts

Court.

The plaintiff in this case is a small utility district raising a big question — the constitutionality of §5 of the Voting Rights Act. The district has an elected board, and is required by §5 to seek preclearance from federal authorities in Washington, D. C., before it can change anything about those elections. This is required even though there has never been any evidence of racial discrimination in voting in the district.

*197The district filed suit seeking relief from these preclearance obligations under the “bailout” provision of the Voting Rights Act. That provision allows the release of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by248 opinions

  1. Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Deal v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  3. Shelby County v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Voisine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Marc Veasey v. Greg AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

243 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API