Legal Opinion
Cencast Services, L.P. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 3, 2010No. Nos. 02-1916T, 02-1917T, 02-1918T, 02-1919T, 02-1920T, 02-1921T, 02-1922T, 02-1923T, 02-1924T, 02-1925TPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
Before the Court are several motions relating to plaintiffs’ claims that certain of the workers whose employment taxes are at issue in these cases were actually independent contractors, not employees. Defendant has moved in limine to preclude plaintiffs from asserting their independent contractor claims based principally on the doctrine of variance (docket entry 249, Jan. 15, 2010) (“Def.’s Mot.”). Plaintiffs have opposed defendant’s motion and cross-moved for partial summary judgment, seeking an order determining that the Court possesses jurisdiction…
2Cases cited100 opinions
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Laboratory Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Heger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Jonathan L. Kaplan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Chapman Law Firm, LPA v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.