Legal Opinion

State v. Hennings

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 1995No. 35193C; CA A79169PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

The Supreme Court has remanded this case, 320 Or 500, 887 P2d 788 (1995), for reconsideration in the light of State v. Kephart, 320 Or 443, 887 P2d 774 (1994), and State v. Martin, 320 Or 448, 887 P2d 782 (1994). We determine that defendant’s claim of error is reviewable and remand for resentencing.

Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant pled guilty to theft and to two counts of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. The state dismissed the remaining charges of the eight-count indictment. On one count of delivery, the parties reserved for hearing the allegations that would establish the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. RaineyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. KephartOregon Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API