Legal Opinion
Bunge Edible Oil Corp. v. M/V TORM RASK
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided January 15, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-5514PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
FELDMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court are three motions. Defendant Dampskibsselskabet Torm (Dampsk. Torm), owner of the M/V TORM RASK, and the Canadian Pacific defendants move for a summary judgment that the cargo claim of Bunge Edible Oil Corporation (Bunge) against the defendants is barred by the time limitation period provided in COGSA. The Canadian Pacific defendants also move for an order staying this lawsuit pending arbitration pursuant to a provision of the charter agreement between one of the Canadian Pacific companies and Dampsk. Torm. For the reasons that follow,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. HohriSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- William Hohri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Miller Brewing Company v. Fort Worth Distributing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,790 Rayford Price and Barbara Ashley Price v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. And George WilmotCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Jones v. the Flying ClipperDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rogers v. BrownDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1997
- Bunge Edible Oil Corp. v. M/VS' Torm Rask & Fort SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Ferrostaal, Inc. v. M/V YVONNEDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1998
- Touton, S.A. v. M v. Rizcun TraderDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Bunge Edible Oil Corporation v. M/Vs' Torm RaskCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.