Legal Opinion
Bunge Edible Oil Corp. v. M/VS' Torm Rask & Fort Steele
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 2, 1992No. 91-3174PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
I
Bunge Edible Oil Corporation appeals the district court’s dismissal of its admiralty and maritime claims against M/Vs’ Torm Rask and Fort Steele, in rem, and Canadian Pacific (Bermuda) Ltd., in personam, because Bunge brought suit more than one year after the delivery of the goods. We affirm.
II
Plaintiff Bunge Edible Oil Corporation (Bunge) contracted with Defendant Canadian Pacific (Bermuda) Ltd. (Canadian Pacific Bermuda) to ship palm oil from Pasir Gu-dang, Malaysia to the United States. The palm oil was loaded aboard the M/V TORM RASK for delivery to New Orleans or New York. The bill of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jeffrey G. Russ and Shannon C. Russ v. International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Jimmy R. Trial v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Francosteel Corp. v. N. v. Nederlandsch AmerikaanscheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Bunge Edible Oil Corp. v. M/V TORM RASKDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sabah Shipyard Sdn. Bhd. v. M/V Harbel TapperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Dimond Rigging Co. v. BDP Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Unimac Company, Inc. v. C.F. Ocean Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Bunge Edible Oil Corporation v. M/Vs' Torm RaskCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- ELCO Insurance Company Ltd. v. Spirit Trucking CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.