Legal Opinion

Jones v. the Flying Clipper

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 5, 1953PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

This case is one of first impression involving the $500 limitation of liability provision, § 1304(5) of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1 2 46 U.S.C.A. §§ 1300-1315 (hereinafter called the “Act”).

The facts are stipulated. Libel-ants sue as endorsees of a bill of lading. On October 8, 1948, the Ford Motor Company delivered to respondent as a common carrier twenty packages containing automobiles and automobile parts for carriage on its vessel, the S. S. Flying Clipper, for delivery at Guam to libelants. Although a clean bill of lading was issued thus obligating the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The CaledoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. St. Johns N. F. Shipping Corp. v. . S. A. Companhia Geral Commercial Do Rio De JaneiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. The Maggie HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Steamship Willdomino v. Citro Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. The Malcolm Baxter, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Ss Hong Kong Producer, Her Engines, Etc., and Universal Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Seguros Banvenez, S.A. v. S/S Oliver DrescherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Standard Electrica, S.A. v. Hamburg Sudamerikanische Dampfschifffahrts-Gesellschaft, Defendant-Appellee,and Columbus Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Thyssen, Inc. v. S.S. Fortune Star, Her Engines, Boiler, Etc., Evolution Maritime Enterprises, Ltd., and Taiwan International Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Mitsui & Co., Ltd. And Ataka & Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. American Export Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Armstrong Cork Canada, Ltd., and Armstrong Cork Company v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API