Legal Opinion
Ferrostaal, Inc. v. M/V YVONNE
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided June 22, 1998No. CIV.A. 96-4116PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
PORTEOUS, District Judge.
This cause came for hearing on a previous date upon the Motions of the defendants, Littlestone Shipping, Inc. and Bossclip Ltd., for Partial Summary Judgment. Oral argument was waived and the matter was taken under submission on the briefs. Having considered the parties’ memoranda and the relevant law, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
I. Background
The plaintiff, Ferrostaal, Inc. (“Ferros-taal”) is an importer of steel into the United States, that ordered a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Tubacex, Inc. v. M/V RisanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ferrostaal, Inc. v. M/V Sea PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Ferrostaal, Inc. v. M/V Sea PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- In Re the Complaint of Rationis Enterprises, Inc. of PanamaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999