Legal Opinion
United States v. Hohri
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 1, 1987No. 86-510PublishedCited by 618 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell
In this case we must decide which court — the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or the appropriate regional Court of Appeals — has jurisdiction over an appeal from a Federal District Court’s decision of a case raising both a nontax claim under the Little Tucker Act and a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA).
I
During World War II, the Government of the United States removed approximately 120,000 Japanese-Americans from their homes and placed them in internment camps. Respondents are an organization of Japanese-Americans and 19 individuals — former internees and their…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- William Hohri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by618 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Coalition for Underground Expansion v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
613 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.