Legal Opinion
Minthorne v. Seeburg Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 21, 1968No. 21639PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.
These appeals grow out of an action by Seeburg Corporation, a corporation and Seeburg Distributing Company, a corporation, (hereafter collectively “Seeburg”).1 The defendants were Jean J. Minthorne and Melanie Minthorne, (hereafter “Minthorne”), and others not involved in this appeal. The action was on contract for indemnification. Jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship and a demand in excess of $10,000.-00.
*239Minthorne counter-claimed for breach of contract. The jury verdict was against Seeburg on its claim and for Minthorne on the counter-claim in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Southern Pac. Co. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Siebrand v. GossnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Gordon Mailloux Enterprises, Inc., and Merchants Wholesale Co., Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Verdier v. VerdierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Fenner v. Dependable Trucking Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Hawaii Federal Asbestos CasesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1990
- Watson Construction Co. v. Reppel Steel & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Fenner v. Dependable Trucking CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.