Legal Opinion
Southern Pac. Co. v. Guthrie
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1951No. 12164PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
After our decision in Southern Pacific Company v. Guthrie, 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 295, we granted a rehearing limited to the questions “whether the damages are excessive, and if so, what the action of the court should be.” The argument upon rehearing was before the court sitting in bank.
The facts relating to the character and extent of Guthrie’s injuries, and his loss of prospective earnings, are stated in the former opinion. There the court attempted to arrive at a conclusion as to the limit of permissible award for the loss of expected earnings. It is apparent that this item…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- John R. McWeeney v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Anibal Conte, Libelant-Appellee-Appellant v. Flota Mercante Del Estado, Respondent-Appellant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. QuattrocchiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.