Legal Opinion
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Duncan
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 9, 1940No. 30PublishedCited by 733 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
In this case we are called upon to determine the appropriate procedure under Rule 50 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Tó recover, damages for personal injuries, respondent (hereinafter spoken of as plaintiff) brought action against petitioner (hereinafter spoken of as defendant), pursuant to an Arkansas statute declaring that corporations should be liable for. injuries to an employe attributable to the negligence of a fellow employe. The com-, plaint alleged that the plaintiff, while in the defendant’s service, had been so injured. The answer denied the plaintiff was an employe of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Phillips v. NegleySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by733 opinions
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
728 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.