Legal Opinion
Siebrand v. Gossnell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1956No. 14468PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.
This case arises under the diversity jurisdiction of the district court, and presents various problems in the law of negligence, including particularly the effect of the return of separate verdicts against certain defendants and alleged apportionment of a verdict between such defendants.
Appellees George F. Gossnell and Estella Gossnell, husband and wife, and hereinafter called the Gossnells, were travelling by automobile on the highway near Tempe, Arizona, on February 20, 1953. A truck operated by appellant Carroll, and belonging to appellants, P. W. Siebrand…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Ford v. Revlon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Gypsum Carrier, Inc. v. William D. HandelsmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Gary D. Patton, Cross-Appellant v. Albert E. Guyer, Martha Frances Guyer, Howard Fisher, D/B/A Fisher's I.G.A., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.