Legal Opinion

MacNicol v. E. Coalinga Oil Fields Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1943No. Sac. 5475PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action to quiet title and for declaratory relief.

The case was presented to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts supplemented by documentary and oral evidence introduced during the course of the trial. There is no dispute as to the facts.

In 1919 George Schwinn and Mattie Kearns owned an irregular quarter section of land containing approximately 183 acres located in Fresno County. The land is about twelve miles from the town of Coalinga. Its surface is barren and unimproved, with no roads or streets surrounding it. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Elliott v. McIntoshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Allan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hall v. North Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Wall v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Main v. LegnittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Faus v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Murray v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API