Legal Opinion
Allan v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1936No. S. F. 15465PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Action to quiet title to land situated in the City and County of San Francisco. The land in dispute formerly constituted a part of Ash and Birch Streets, as shown on a map of the “Hayes Tract”, filed for record in the office of the county recorder of said city and county on March 8, 1860. Those portions of said streets lying between Van Ness Avenue and Franklin Street which include the land in controversy were, by resolution of the board of supervisors, duly and regularly passed during the year 1928, vacated and ordered closed. The defendant, the City and County of San Francisco, is now the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bissell v. . the New York Central R.R. CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Johnson v. . GrenellNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Brown v. BachelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Earl v. DutourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pinsky v. SloatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- City of Redlands v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- MacNicol v. E. Coalinga Oil Fields Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Main v. LegnittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Speer v. BlaskerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.