Legal Opinion

Faus v. Nelson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1966No. Civ. 28261PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaus, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in an action to quiet title to a strip of land about 80 feet in width and about 2.938 acres in area. The land in question is an abandoned right-of-way of the Pacific Electric Railway Company (“Pacific Electric”). Plaintiff’s title derives from a deed dated February 18, 1955, from Glendora Land Company. Plaintiff’s grantor was the original subdivider of the tract through which the right-of-way ran. Defendants trace their title to individual grantees of lots in the tract which border the right-of-way.

The tract map in question was filed and recorded by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bissell v. . the New York Central R.R. CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Brown v. BachelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Freeman v. Affiliated Property CraftsmenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Millyard v. FausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. BEWLEY v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  5. Odd Fellows Sierra Recreation Assn. v. Coleman CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API