Elliott v. McIntosh
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J., pro tem.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action by plaintiff to eject defendants from a strip of land lying between the lands of the parties hereto, and being a portion of what was formerly laid out on a map as a street, but which was never accepted or opened for travel. The said tract was platted in 1873 and lots sold therein to predecessors of the parties hereto, Samuel Elliott, the husband of appellant, having acquired his title in October, 1883, the defendants having acquired theirs in May, 1917, just prior to the commencement of this action.
Samuel Elliott,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Davidow v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Allen v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- County of Inyo v. GivenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- City of Santa Clara v. IvancovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Sutton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Whittaker v. OttoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Gross v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.