Legal Opinion
Main v. Legnitto
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1964No. Civ. 21852PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.
In this action to quiet title we are called upon to determine whether a crescent-shaped area shown on a recorded map as a cul-de-sac at the end of a road in the Town of Fairfax was intended by the subdivider to be a “highway" within the meaning of Civil Code section 1112 so as to pass title to the center line thereof.
The basic facts are not in dispute. On September 17, 1913, a subdivision map entitled “Manor," including the property here in controversy, was recorded in the office of the County Becorder of Marin County by Fairfax Development Company, a corporation, the then owner of all the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Neff v. ErnstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Faus v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Odd Fellows Sierra Recreation Assn. v. Coleman CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Pear v. City & County of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Pear v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.