Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Helms Bakery Limited

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1967No. L. A. 29389PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Plaintiff Scott Schwartz, age four, was struck by an automobile as he crossed a street in the middle of *235the block to buy a doughnut from defendant Taylor, the driver of a retail truck owned by defendant Helms Bakery Limited. The trial court granted a motion for nonsuit. We reverse. We hold that by undertaking to direct the child to an assigned rendezvous with the truck the defendants assumed a duty to exercise due care for his safety. The trial court therefore erroneously withdrew from the jury the questions whether defendants negligently discharged their duty and whether such negligence…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Andrick v. Town of BuckhannonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API