Legal Opinion
Searcy v. Hemet Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 1986No. E001693PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Marcia Ann Searcy appeals from judgments of dismissal following the court’s sustaining without leave to amend the demurrers of defendants Hemet Unified School District (School District) and State of California by and through its agent California Highway Patrol (CHP) to plaintiff’s second amended complaint. Plaintiff advances a host of contentions directed at demonstrating the demurrers should not have been sustained. We discern no error in the court’s rulings and therefore affirm the judgments.
Facts and Procedural Setting
On January 6, 1983, plaintiff, a six-year-old first…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Dailey v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Hoyem v. Manhattan Beach City School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Van Ort v. Estate of StanewichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Creason v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Herd v. Cnty. of San BernardinoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
- D.K. Ex Rel. G.M. v. Solano County Office of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.