Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2010No. 2009-1606PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} After appellant, Andrew Miller, was indicted on two counts of felonious assault, the state offered him the opportunity to plead guilty to a single count of aggravated assault. In discussing the plea agreement with Miller, a visiting judge informed him that the victim had requested $20,410 in restitution. Miller’s attorney acknowledged that Miller was aware of the request for restitution but stated that restitution “was of concern” to Miller. Nevertheless, after consulting with counsel, Miller eventually pleaded guilty to the reduced charge. The visiting judge informed Miller that his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Mayer v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Mayer v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Gaskins v. ShiplevyOhio Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. QuallsOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Davis v. Janas (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. LeonhartOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API