Legal Opinion

Munic. Court v. State, Ex Rel.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1933No. 23665PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this case the record shows that there was no suspension of sentence to enable the various defendants to prosecute error; nor was there a suspension of imposition of sentence and a placing of the various defendants on probation; nor was there a conditional sentence, allowable in misdemeanor cases. The record does show, however, that upon trial and conviction the municipal court sentenced the defendants to pay a fine of twenty-five dollars and costs or be committed until the same were paid, and that thereupon said municipal court suspended generally the execution of such sentences so imposed…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Ex Parte BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. In Re WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Snodgrass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State ex rel. Ballard v. O'DonnellOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Mayer v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. Bates (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API