Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Duran v. Kelsey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 2005No. 2005-0017PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition to compel a trial court judge to correct a criminal sentence based on a plea agreement. We affirm.

{¶ 2} In 2000, appellant, Augusto Duran, entered into a plea agreement with the prosecutor in which Duran agreed to plead guilty to a felony charge of cocaine possession in exchange for the prosecutor’s recommendation that Duran receive a five-year prison sentence. In the plea agreement, Duran specified that he understood that “any recommendations are not binding on the Court” and that the maximum…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Mayer v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Mayer v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BuchananOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. McAuley v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State ex rel. Scott v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. RonanOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. Howard, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Scioto County2017
  5. State ex rel. Bunting v. Styer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API