Legal Opinion

Hertz Corp. v. Avis, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 3, 1994No. 94 Civ. 7384 (JFK)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KEENAN, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of plaintiff, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, for a preliminary injunction preventing defendant from falsely advertising a service, the “Return Valet” service, that it cannot provide. Defendant opposes plaintiffs application for a preliminary injunction.

The Court held a preliminary injunction hearing October 23, 1994. Submissions from the parties were received on October 26, 1994. For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied.

*210FINDINGS OF FACT

Plaintiff Hertz Corporation (hereinafter “Hertz”) sued defendant Avis, Inc.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Citibank, N.A. And Citicorp v. Citytrust and Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. The Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Bell & Howell: Mamiya Co. v. Masel Supply Co. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Johnson & Johnson v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lokai Holdings LLC v. Twin Tiger USA LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Espin v. GantnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. General Cigar Co., Inc. v. GDM INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  4. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Clorox Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  5. Parks, LLC v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API