Legal Opinion

Parks, LLC v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 10, 2016No. 5:15-cv-00946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 124— Granted

Joseph F. Leeson, Jr., United States District Judge

I. Introduction

This ease involves a trademark and false advertising dispute.

The Plaintiff, Parks, LLC, claims to be the owner of the trademark “Parks” that is used to sell sausages and other food products. Defendants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Hillshire Brands Company are owners of the “Ball Park” trademark that is used to sell a popular brand of frankfurters.

In 2014, Defendants launched a new line of “super-premium” frankfurters under the name “Park’s Finest.” Parks…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  4. Clorox Co. Puerto Rico v. Proctor & Gamble Commercial Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  5. Scott Paper Company, a Corporation v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parks LLC v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. Larry Pitt & Assocs. v. Lundy Law LLPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. CRASH PROOF RETIREMENT, LLC v. PriceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Island Saints LLC v. Cardow, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2024
  5. Island Saints LLC v. Cardow, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API