Legal Opinion
Schut v. Doyle
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 16, 1959No. Civ. 5967PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
This is an action to quiet title in which plaintiffs seek to establish the priority of their rights under a contract which they entered into with the defendants B. E. Doyle and Mollie A. Doyle for the purchase of Lots 7 and 8, Tract 1756, in Buena Park, Orange County.
There is no dispute as to the material facts, which are set forth in the pretrial conference order.
On January 22, 1953, Jennie E. Page sold and conveyed Tract 1756 to the Doyles without having received payment in full therefor and also without reserving any specific security or lien on said property by way of a deed of trust, or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Fisher v. ShropshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Finnell v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Fulkerson v. StilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Wutzke v. Bill Reid Painting Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- First Fidelity Thrift & Loan Ass'n v. ALLIANCE BK.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Ruth v. Lytton Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Saslow v. Andrew (In re Loretto Winery Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.