Legal Opinion
Fulkerson v. Stiles
California Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1909No. L.A. No. 2393PublishedCited by 22 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The complaint purports to state a cause of action in favor of James F. Fulkerson to quiet title to land claimed as community property, but standing in the name of Fannie L. Fulkerson, who is the wife of James. A general demurrer to the complaint was overruled and this ruling is assigned as error. The- complaint alleges that James F. Fulkerson is the owner of the land; that it was purchased by him in February, 1907, after his marriage with Fannie L. Fulkerson, that it was paid for with community funds,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Wilhoit v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- California Cured Fruit Assn. v. StellingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by22 opinions
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Gilmour v. North Pasadena Land Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- First Fidelity Thrift & Loan Ass'n v. ALLIANCE BK.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Bruggemeyer v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.