Finnell v. Finnell
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Garret W. McEnerney, for Appellant Finnell Land Company. Charles W. Slack, and W. P. Johnson, for Appellant John Finnell, Jr., Administrator.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff on October 14, 1904, to enforce an alleged vendor’s lien upon 4250 acres of land in Tehama County, sold by plaintiff to John Finnell, Sr., his father, on October 15, 1890, the amount due on account of the purchase price being ninety-two thousand dollars, with interest at six per cent per annum from October 15, 1902, evidenced by a promissory note given by John Finnell, Sr., to plaintiff October 15, 1890, which, by its terms, was payable October 15, 1900. John Finnell, Sr., having died prior to judgment, the defendant John Finnell, Jr., administrator of his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Fisher v. ShropshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Avery v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. GionisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Solon v. LichtensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Blankenship v. MyersIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Royal Consol. Mining Co. v. Royal Consol. Mines (Cal.) Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.