State v. Coolidge

Kevin Coolidge appeals from two judgments of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to sec. 974.06, Stats. (1989-90). 1 Coolidge contends that the trial court relied upon erroneous and prejudicial information in the presentence investigation report (PSI). He also argues that the habitual criminality (repeater) portions of the sentences were not authorized by law because he did not directly and specifically admit to the prior conviction, nor did the state produce evidence of the prior conviction. We conclude that Coolidge did not establish that the…