State v. Tiepelman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.
¶ 1. Larxy A. Tiepel-man (Tiepelman) seeks review of a published court of appeals' decision1 affirming a circuit court's judgment of conviction and postconviction order that denied his motion for resentencing. Tiepelman's motion was based on his claim that the circuit court relied on inaccurate information at his sentencing hearing. The issue before this court is whether, on a motion for resentencing based on the circuit court's alleged reliance on inaccurate information, a defendant must prove that the circuit court actually relied on the inaccurate information, or that the court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. LechnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. FranklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Promotor v. PollardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- State v. HarborWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. CainWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Danny Robert AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.