Legal Opinion

State v. Spaeth

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1996No. 95-1827-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

This case is before the court on certification by the court of appeals, following the sentencing of the defendant, William E. Spaeth, by the circuit court for Washington County, Richard T. Becker, Judge, for a fifth offense within a five-year period of operating a motor vehicle after revocation (OAR). The defendant asserts that he did not admit to, and the State did not prove, the four prior OAR convictions necessary to impose the statutorily enhanced penalties prescribed for fifth-time OAR offenders. Because we conclude that the record does not adequately establish the defendant's prior OAR…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reginald D. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Yauger v. SKIING ENTERPRISES, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. McAllisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. FarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. WidemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WidemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. SaundersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Nauga, Inc. v. Westel Milwaukee Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  4. Bruner Corporation v. R.A. Bruner Company and Robert A. Bruner, Sr., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. State v. DevriesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API