Legal Opinion

State v. Goldstein

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 2, 1994No. 93-1358-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Seth Goldstein appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle without owner's consent (OMVWOC) pursuant to § 943.23(2), Stats., and obstructing an officer pursuant to § 946.41, STATS. Goldstein was charged and sentenced as a repeat offender. The appellate issue is whether Goldstein's prior conviction was adequately proven pursuant to § 973.12(1), Stats. We hold it was not. We reverse the enhanced penalty provisions of the judgment. We remand with directions that the trial court enter an amended judgment sentencing Gold-stein to the maximum sentences permitted for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. McAllisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  3. State v. FarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. RachwalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. SaundersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. BondsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. KoeppenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  4. State v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  5. State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API