State v. Farr
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.
There are two issues in this case. The first one is whether the presentence report which contained the defendant’s “prior record” met the status of an official report pursuant to sec. 973.12(1), Stats.1 *653The other issue is whether the defendant admitted that he had been convicted of a felony during the five-year period immediately preceding the commission of the present burglary offense for which he was being sentenced and therefore relieved the state of its proof pursuant to sec. 973.12(1).
This case was commenced by the filing of a criminal complaint on March 16, 1981, which charged the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Block v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Neely v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. AvilaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- State v. WidemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. RachwalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. SaundersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.