Copley Township Board of Trustees v. W.J. Horvath Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1DissentCarr, Judge
{¶ 20} I respectfully dissent. I would sustain appellant’s assignment of error because the injunction issued as a consequence of appellant’s contempt is overly broad and unreasonable.
{¶21} Appellant argues on appeal that the injunction was unreasonable because it prohibited him from operating any business on the property. I agree. The township complaint sought to enjoin appellant from operating a mulch business in violation of the zoning code. A mutually agreed upon injunction placed specific restraints on how appellant operated his mulch business. “Equity requires that an injunction should…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. KilbaneOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Cincinnati v. Cincinnati District Council 51Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
- Eastwood Mall, Inc. v. SlancoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Zakany v. ZakanyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.