State v. Kilbane
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Brown, J.
The sole issue raised in this appeal is the propriety of the sanction imposed upon appellee for her contemptuous conduct. To resolve this issue the contempt must be reviewed on two levels. Cincinnati v. Cincinnati District Council 51 (1973), 35 Ohio St. 2d 197, certiorari denied (1974), 415 U.S. 994. First, appellee’s conduct must be examined to see if it constituted a direct or indirect contempt. Second, the trial court’s treatment of this matter must be analyzed to ascertain whether appellee was dealt with under that court’s civil or criminal contempt powers.
The trial judge in this cause…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
- Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Corn v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Robert L. Steele v. Terry D. Taylor, Supt., Owen J. Kilbane v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt., Martin A. Kilbane v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- In Re PurolaOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.