Legal Opinion
Eastwood Mall, Inc. v. Slanco
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1994No. 91-2200PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
The issue before this court is whether an injunction prohibiting “picketing, patrolling, handbilling, soliciting, or engaging in any other similar activities” on the property of a privately owned shopping center is an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech in violation of Section 11, Article I of the Ohio Constitution. For the following reasons, we find that it does not violate the Ohio Constitution, and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
The law is well settled that there is no right under the First Amendment to the United States…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Republican Party of Texas v. DietzTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Logsdon v. HainsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- L.A. All. for Survival v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Empresas Puertorriqueñas de Desarrollo, Inc. v. Hermandad Independiente de Empleados TelefónicosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2000
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.