Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Cincinnati District Council 51

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1973No. 72-697PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.

This appeal raises serious and difficult questions regarding the powers of courts to punish for contempt of their orders.

It is noted at the outset that both a temporary restraining order issued on January 4, 1970, and the permanent injunction issued on January 6, 1970, enjoined Council 51 “* * * from carrying on a strike and/or picketing against the city of Cincinnati, Ohio.” It is not here *199contended that the injunction was unlawfully issued, and it is conceded that by striking Council 51 acted in contempt of the injunction. Appellants, however, assert ten propositions of law, in essence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Windham Bank v. TomaszczykOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. Town of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. In Matter of LandsOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Belding v. State Ex Rel. HeifnerOhio Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. KilbaneOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Johnson v. County CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Liming v. DamosOhio Supreme Court · 2012

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API