Legal Opinion

Zakany v. Zakany

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1984No. 83-188PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.

The present appeal raises two issues.

Appellant’s first proposition of law relates to R.C. 2301.37, a bureau of support statute which sets forth certain notice requirements and related procedures to be followed in the event of an obligor’s default. Appellant asserts that the trial court failed to follow this statutory scheme and therefore lacked authority to find appellant in contempt.

Without addressing the merits of this argument or the propriety of using the bureau of support as a means of enforcing the court’s order, we note that appellant’s proposition was not assigned as error in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blausey v. SteinOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Turner v. AlbinOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Harris v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Dow Chemical Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Planned Parenthood Asss'n v. Project JerichoOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Pugh v. PughOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Tilford v. CrushOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Rice v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court · 1991

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API