Legal Opinion
Barceloux v. Dow
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1959No. Civ. 18424PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from an order releasing a portion of defendant’s property from a levy of attachment and from an order striking plaintiffs’ bill of particulars from the clerk’s transcript on appeal.
On October 30, 1957, plaintiffs, P. M. Barceloux and B. J. Goldstein, attorneys at law, filed their complaint for attorneys ’ fees in the amount of $35,000 plus interest at 7 per cent from August 14, 1957, for services rendered to the defendant, Maxine B. Dow, in her capacity as widow, heir, devisee, legatee and creditor of the estate of Edgar L. Dow. On the same…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Town of Santa Monica v. GuidingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- De Leonis v. EtchepareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Finch v. McVeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Lewis v. SteifelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Baldwin v. Napa & Sonoma Wine Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Waffer International Corp. v. KhorsandiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Arcturus Manufacturing Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Commercial & Farmers National Bank v. HetrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Paul H. Aschkar & Company v. The Honorable Jesse W. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- J. C. Peacock, Inc. v. HaskoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.