Legal Opinion

J. C. Peacock, Inc. v. Hasko

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1961No. Civ. 25222PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

This appeal is from the judgment in the “fraud” case referred to in the companion appeal ante, p. 353 [16 Cal.Rptr. 518] (No. 24714) this day decided. Sought to be recovered were secret profits realized from the operation of defendant Pacific Aircraft Products, the creation of which company (as pleaded in the “bonus” case) assertedly resulted from a conspiracy among the various individual defendants to cheat and defraud plaintiff in the subcontracting of work to that partnership. Unlike the remaining individual defendants, Sanchez and Hinman were not employed by plaintiff; however, they are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Mains v. City Title Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moe v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gillis v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. American Loan Corp. v. California Commercial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Jackson v. Continental Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API