Legal Opinion
Paul H. Aschkar & Company v. The Honorable Jesse W. Curtis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 14, 1964No. 18948PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge.
These proceedings bring to us for review the order of respondent judge vacating a writ of attachment issued in a civil action pending before him. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing respondent to vacate his order and to restore the writ of attachment.
The action in connection with which the attachment was issued was brought by petitioner in the District Court for the Southern District of California, under the fraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa. The defendant was a corporation subject to service of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Stella v. KaiserDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Carey v. German American InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- G. W. Bull & Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Friedman v. United States Trunk Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. RitterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- International Controls Corp. v. VescoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- J. E. Stevens v. Hollie VowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Murdock v. Allina (In Re Curtina International)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Hoc, Inc. v. McAllister (In Re McAllister)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.