Legal Opinion

Finch v. McVean

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 1907No. Civ. No. 253PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.

Appeal from an order dissolving an attachment.

The action was on two promissory notes of $4,000 and $3,500, bearing interest respectively at the rates of ten and seven per cent per annum. Both are set, out in extenso in the complaint and the prayer of the complaint is for $7,500, “with interest thereon according to the terms of said promissory notes, and costs of suit.” In the affidavit for the attachment the indebtedness is stated to be “in the sum of seven thousand five hundred dollars, besides interest.” The writ of attachment recites that the action was commenced to recover $7,500,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Town of Santa Monica v. GuidingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. De Leonis v. EtchepareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Baldwin v. Napa & Sonoma Wine Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Bank of California v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Merced County v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Board of Sup'rsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Lyydikainen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Tyson v. ReineckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Peninsula Properties Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API