Legal Opinion

People v. Henderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 1948No. Civ. 16354PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.

Defendants are the owners in fee of a certain portion of Lot 59, Rancho Santa Paula y Saticoy, in the county of Ventura. Their predecessors in interest had granted to the State of California “a right of way and incidents thereof” for a public highway upon and across a portion of said Lot 59. The area of the easement may be generally described as follows: it extends in a northeasterly and southwesterly direction; it is 71.18 feet wide along its northeasterly boundary, and at a distance of 343.56 feet southwesterly it is 114,51 feet wide; its southeasterly boundary is the center line of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Metcalf v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Vanderhurst v. TholckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. City of Emporia v. HumphreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. City of Nampa v. SwayneIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bello v. ABA Energy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. McCarthy v. California Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Airways Water Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API