Legal Opinion

Bello v. ABA Energy Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 2004No. A102287PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARGULIES, J.

Plaintiffs own a parcel of land in rural Solano County bounded by a county road. The land underlying and immediately adjoining the road is subject to a public right-of-way. Defendant ABA Energy Corporation (ABA) is a private company that operates a natural gas field located near plaintiffs’ parcel. After obtaining an appropriate permit from the county, but without notice to plaintiffs, ABA installed a pipeline in the right-of-way on plaintiffs’ land to transport natural gas recovered from ABA’s drilling operations. Plaintiffs sued for trespass, contending that ABA was…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gutierrez v. Autowest, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Paiva v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Schmidt v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. North Gualala Water Co. v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Jamison v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Anderson v. Time Warner Telecom of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API