Legal Opinion
McCarthy v. California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1982No. Civ. 20078PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
Plaintiffs, leasehold owners and developers of property in South Lake Tahoe, brought this suit seeking a writ of administrative mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5), together with declaratory and injunctive relief. The action sought to set aside California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency’s (CTRPA) assertion of jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ building project and to compel the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) to issue an encroachment permit allowing highway access to their property. The named individual defendants were sued in their official capacities. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Whaler's Village Club v. Califonia Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Brentwood Assn. for No Drilling, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Burchett v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Winnaman v. Cambria Community Services DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.