Legal Opinion

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 2015No. Civil Action No. 14-6978PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DALZELL, Judge.

I. Introduction

We consider here defendant Gilead Sciences, Inc.’s (“Gilead”) motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs— the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”), John Doe, and Jane Doe — are suing Gilead on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated alleging that Gilead’s pricing scheme for the sale of its patented Hepatitis C drugs violates Section 1557(a) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, constitutes unjust enrichment, breaches the im*694plied duties of good faith and fair dealing, and violates California…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Callum v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
  2. Doe v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Weinreb v. Xerox Bus. Servs., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. In re EpipenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  5. And v. Essentia HealthDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API