Legal Opinion

Saxton v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1933No. 28866PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, District Judge.

Upon appeal taken from the decision of the compensation commissioner awarding compensation for total permanent disability, this case was tried in the court below and dismissed on the ground that the ailment complained of did not in any wise result from the accident alleged as the cause thereof. The case is one in which Delmar Saxton is suffering from schizophrenia or dementia prsecox, and in which Bessie E. Saxton, his guardian, charges that his affliction is due to an injury sustained by him in an automobile collision. The case is now here on appeal duly taken from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. EatonNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co. v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Townsend v. LoeffelbeinNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Kuhtnick v. CareyNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Booke v. Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hare v. Watts Trucking ServiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Rose v. City of FairmontNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Beam v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Cunningham v. Armour & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API