Legal Opinion

Rose v. City of Fairmont

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1941No. 31239PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is an appeal by the city of Fairmont, defendant, from an award given E. M. Rose, plaintiff, under the workmen’s compensation law.

The main facts are not in dispute. It appears that plaintiff, a man 50 years of age, had been water and light commissioner of the city of Fairmont for about 12 years, and *551was earning $150 a month. Plaintiff is a slender man, weighing 153 pounds, and five feet eight inches tall. The city owned a Model T Ford truck, which was kept in a small lean-to at the back of the plant, and was used by plaintiff and other employees. While this Model T had a starter, it had…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. EatonNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Manning v. PomereneNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Saxton v. Sinclair Refining Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Price v. Burlington Refrigerator Express Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co. v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lewter v. Abercrombie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Anderson v. CowgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hamilton v. HuebnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Tilghman v. MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Pixa v. Grainger Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API