Legal Opinion

Kuhtnick v. Carey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1933No. 28716PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This is an action under the terms of the workmen’s compensation law of this state. The appellee, Emma Kuhtnick, as plaintiff, secured a judgment in the district court for Dodge county against the appellants. From the order of that court overruling their motion for a new trial the appellants, who will hereinafter be referred to as defendants, have appealed.

Plaintiff is the mother of Hugo Kuhtnick. This son died on March 3, 1932. At the time of his death there *763was pending, undetermined, in the district court for Dodge county, an action under the Nebraska workmen’s compensation law against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. EatonNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Green's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Saxton v. Sinclair Refining Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Tucker v. Paxton & Gallagher Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Beam v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Ottens v. Western Contracting Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Bell v. DentonNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API